sixtyandaquarter
Member
I_Can_Iceplode, the Patriots were undefeated all year, and the Giants sucked all year. The spread was a 12.5 point, and if you don't know that's a betting handicap giving the Giants 12.5 points, meaning for your bet to be successful Pats would have to win by 13.
So basically the spread even showed that the Giants statistically would've needed an extra 13 points to win. They were big underdogs, a superbowl spread hasn't been that big in years, quite a few years actually - I've never seen it that big that I can think of. They were statistically not meant to win, hence why they were given 13 points to make the gambling "fair".
So basically the spread even showed that the Giants statistically would've needed an extra 13 points to win. They were big underdogs, a superbowl spread hasn't been that big in years, quite a few years actually - I've never seen it that big that I can think of. They were statistically not meant to win, hence why they were given 13 points to make the gambling "fair".