RTD's plot were pretty poor and predictable by comparison to Moffat but his character development was second to none.
I completely disagree about the fact that there has been minimal character development; each episode has presented a new facet of the relationship between Amy and the Doctor; we have seen something new about Amy in each episode.
I still don't know who Martha is, and why I should give a damn about her. Rose's only characterization became a wish-fulfillment avatar for RTD. Only Donna got developed - but even that was all a bit "bang-crash now-I-see-things-differently".
the silurian two parter was decent but it was boring, at the end of the first part i expected some kind of battle to take place but it did not, and i expected with moffat being hyped as the darker writer for doctor that that would happen, but it didn't.
It *was* darker. A battle would have been an incredibly simplistic way to resolve the issue - we would have had our heroes to route for, and our villains. Instead, the end of the episode had the Doctor reassuring a mother that the lesson her son would take away from the events would make him the strong person she clearly could not be.
The story was resolved in a nod to Doctor Who's "Quatermass-esque" origins: ordinary humans sat down with the Lizards and talked about the issues that faced them. They tried to make peace. Negotiation with the aliens rather than repelling them.
I found the fact that the humans, who are usually the victims in the stories were clearly, however accidentally, the aggressors.
The problem with ALL Silurian episodes is that they are too short, and always end with a nice reset button so as not to impact the wider story and the implication that all the stories could be true.
The original Silurian serial with Pertwee is fantastic - the monster sit around and debate whether is is acceptable for them to use force against "the Apes", whether negotiation would work or what they could hope to achieve etc. It all goes down the drain the moment the Brigadier blows them up "in self-defense". (Which was alluded to in the two-parter).
The Beast Below, The Silurian Two Parter which was so boring I can't even remember it's name, Vampires of Venice
I really don't see how "The Beast Below" is boring filler. You might have thought it was boring, but you certainly can't call it "filler". It was an episode, pure and simple.
It was the "Take the companion on a first trip into the future" episode and in it, we get some great characterization for Amy - this is the third time she's met the Doctor, but she *knows* him, and furthermore, she's independent and his equal. The other companions only developed this after they had traveled with the Doctor for sometime.
The Vampires of Venice? Filler? You've said there's no character development in any episode apart from the Dream Lord ep - but this entire episode was all about character development. Look at where Amy, Rory and the Doctor start out in that episode, and look where they end up!
The only episode I was disappointed with was "Vincent and the Doctor" - it would have been great if I was watching it on DVD, but coming off the Silurian finale... It refused to deal with the fact that it was refusing to deal with the facts, if you catch my drift.
If there has been a common thread throughout this entire series, it has been how far individuals will go to in order to survive; it has been the driving motivation of most of the series villains, from Prisoner Zero up to The Alliance.
and the only episode in Who history that I would genuinely say was just HORRIBLE, Victory of the Daleks.
Spoken as someone who has clearly never seen "Delta and the Bannerman". :wink: