What do you Prefer?
- Thread starter RpgWiz
- Start date
Myonosken said:
...the psp can do that out of the box and there's a 4gb memory card for about 120 USD (probably cheaper now).
"mature" doesn't mean an esrb rating of mature. some people don't find a game where you touch a giant pink puffball visually appealing or satisfactory.
I don't know, these days kids that age get a lot of money to waste from mommy and daddy.
True, and it's a shame, because people who judge games like that are missing out on a lot of fun, which to me is the most important part of a game (a reason I'm not a big RPG fan and like platformers more).
Nice way to put words into someones mouth. I don't find platformers fun at all; but I find war games fun. Does that make me a corporate whore and unfun? Some people, me for example, despise platformers. Stop saying people are missing out of a lot of fun because you think they are.
Wow, way to skew what he said to completely mean that he hates everyone that doesn't like platformers. All he was saying was that some people simply look for things that are 'edgy' and avoid some of the funner things, like Kirby games. But wait you're too hyped up on justifying your choice in games that you felt this needed to apply directly to you, sorry. I'm sure he probably was talking exactly about people who prefer war games.
yea what andy said.
case in point: Prince of Persia: Sands of Time vs. Prince of Persia: Warrior Within.
Warrior Within improved on many factors from Sands of Time but completely removed SoT's brilliant architecture design and puzzles for action and bad heavy metal.
because, you know, bad electric guitar riffs existed in the 10th century!!
case in point: Prince of Persia: Sands of Time vs. Prince of Persia: Warrior Within.
Warrior Within improved on many factors from Sands of Time but completely removed SoT's brilliant architecture design and puzzles for action and bad heavy metal.
because, you know, bad electric guitar riffs existed in the 10th century!!
JonoSasson
Member
True; nothing's more an incentive than trying to make yourself better than somebody else.
JonoSasson
Member
Sony forced nothing head on. But it was due to the fact that they would steal the market that gave Nintendo the incentive to release new products. Anyway, we're not here to debate about incentives and whatever...I prefer the DS...the PSP is just a gimmick to me...TO ME. Don't jump down my throat for saying that...
oh wow
i'll never forget when the DS was announced 2 years ago. nintendo's statement about the system was essentially
"LOL 2 SCREENS MOST REVOLUTIONARY HANDHELD EVAR!!!11"
and what came of it? a new mario kart, a bad metroid prime, advance wars with fuzzier graphics, and an animal crossing. ANIMAL CROSSING.
yea, that got me preordering quick (sarcasm)
ironically, all the big budget titles were supposed to be launch titles (except for metroid hunters which was supposed to come out APRIL 5 2005). the only 1st party launch title was mario 64 DS. we didn't get anything until 9 months later with wario ware and advance wars.
as much as i love nintendo, they're horrible at following through with promises. n64 had like... 4 launch games and only one of them was really worth the $60 cartridge. the n64 was pretty much empty until a year later. gamecube also had the exact same problem of offering nothing except "lol mario game" until 2 years into it's life when metroid prime and wind waker came out.
I think over time DSs will be used as specialized controllers for specific Wii games or something (kind of like the GBA could be used with the Cube). Following that, 4 or 5 more variations to DS, then something new. Prolly not groundbreaking, prolly the same double screen but with better graphics and whatnot.