Venetia":2nmdul9l said:
Touche.
En garde!
Mine is pissing off pissy people who piss and bitch about pissing while they piss off the pissers who say I'm pissing them off for my being pissed for them being pissed off without alleviating the pissingness themselves. Piss piss piss piss piss!
I'm sorry, but your pet peeve is pissing off others? James Bond doesn't get it, once again. Yet, he is expected to die. What a shame.
Either way, let us analyze your run-on sentence. You start off by stating that your pet peeve is pissing off a kind of people.
Mine is pissing off [a kind of people].
Then, you proceed on defining that kind of people as people who, and I quote, pissy people who
piss and
bitch about pissing while they piss off another kind of people.
pissy people who piss and bitch about pissing while they piss off [another kind of people]
Notice how I did not do any of these actions, though it is irrelevant, I'll grant you that. Unfortunately, you then proceed on specifying that other kind of people, as people who are:
pissers who say I'm pissing them off for my being pissed [for some reason]
If we run back a few posts, it would appear that you are putting me in the "pissers" category as referenced by the above quote; in other words, the first part of your sentence doesn't seem to apply to me, and as such, it appears I do not piss you off. Very odd indeed, my (not-so-anymore)fair lady! If I recall, I'm the one who said you were pissing me off for my being pissed for
you being pissed without alleviating the pissingness
yourself, although I did indeed replace "you" by "them" because I did not want to explicitly target you.
Thus, your whole sentence is illogical and erroneous. Cannot compute indeed Bill; cannot compute indeed.
I would end with Q.E.D., except that it wouldn't be customary; instead, I shall end with the traditional:
Piss piss piss.