![](https://www.arpgmaker.com/images/discord.png)
Red Dawn;255796 said:Seph is totally right. There is no 'flow' of time. it cant be slowed down, sped up, stopped, moved forwards of backwards. If time travel existed, then god probably would as well OOH SHOT DOWN NON-ATHEISTS!!!
PeteD2S;247947 said:Also, when i get a sensation of Deja Vu, it isn't as most people describe it. My Deja Vu moments normaly feel like they last 5 seconds, they are first triggered by a milisecond familiar moment, followed by "predictions" of whats going to happen next with a fraction of a second between "predictions" and events and when its finally over i think about how fucking weird it feels.
Sephiroth7734;255481 said:My theory? There's no such thing as time. Time is not an invisible essence that pushes our minds forward. "Time" is just the word used to keep track of dates and schedules. When you say that time "moves", all you really mean is that the earth is rotating, and the people on it are moving. Those are the laws of physics, not the movement of "time". If you want to say that time exists, the only way for it to be so is if it was completely still.
Grandor;256082 said:Dude, holy fuck. I thought I was the only one. I feel like that too. Like the stuff I've done now I've done before and I can predict stuff happening because all of that stuff feels like it's happened before.
Grandor;256082 said:Dude, holy fuck. I thought I was the only one. I feel like that too. Like the stuff I've done now I've done before and I can predict stuff happening because all of that stuff feels like it's happened before.
Roman Candle;258507 said:I think what you mean is "Absolute time does not exist", ie there is no universal 'now' or instant which emcompasses the whole universe.
Also, white noise does not give an indication of the past any more than anything else. All particles date back 'to the begining'.
Quantum physics does not say that each choice you make opens a different universe. It suggests that maybe when subatomic particles interact, the result is not defined and that several possible results may in some way take an existance, (ie different "what could have happened"s has an effect on the measureable particle's behavior).
As for the deja vu thing, no offence but I really don't believe it for a second. As Hume pointed out, (talking about miracles at the time), people enjoy stories and want to believe the ones which exite them; to the point where people will believe a story even when rational thought tells them that it's not true.
Roman Candle;239475 said:Yes, travelling forwards in time is a cinch. I personally do not travel at the speed of light all the time, and enjoy a great deal of time beacuse of it. Yes yes indeed.
I recently learned about Wheeler's Delayed Choice experiment. It blew my MIND. Like, dude. Seriously. Wow. Put simply, if you shoot photons through a card with two slits onto a screen, they will form a wave interference pattern, (that is, in some sense it passes both slits). However, detecting the particles between the slits and the screen causes them to lose their wavelike behavior, and the pattern built is one of two bands of light as you would expect for particles.
This is a standerd experiment. But in the Wheeler's Choice varient, instead of placing the detectors between the slit and screen so that the photons are particles when they hit the screen, you put telescopes nearby. In this way, you determine which slit the photon will pass though after it has hit the screen. But here's the wierd thing. When the photon hits the screen, it does so as a particle - no wave pattern. However, at this time, it has not been detected. In fact, it loses is wave property beause it's going to be detected. NO WAY. SERIOUSLY.
In my Quantum Mechanics Must Die varient of the experiment, you set it up so that the screen the photon hits is a LDR, which alters a circuit. The circuit is attatched to the telescopes and activates/deactivates it. When the light is concentrated into two bands, (beacuse it's going to be detected), the telescopes are deactivated and the photon is not detected. However, if the photon is not detected, then it would behave as a wave. But when it is not a particle, the circuit deactivates and reactivates the telescopes, destroying the wave form. In this way, the prediction made invalidates itself, (this is similar to the Laplace's Demon thought experiment, where an infinitely knowledgable being in a determined, determinable universe cannot predict the action of someone who will do the opposite of it's prediction).
Supposedly in quantum mechanics objects can defy the law of excluded middle and possess two conflicting properties. I'd like to know if it can posses neither. Would it then still be light?