I use the class "Dragoon" in my game in a certain fashion, so if I ever read up on this, I have a limited copyright on my game material and will report you for plagiarism. So hopefully the way you shape the actual class will be unique for the game and not a copy off mine, Legend of Dragoon, and the way Final Fantasy interprets dragoons.
This does not say anything about your game material. You're saying that if he uses Dragoons in a similar context to the way you have them in your game, you will accuse him of plagiarism. Tell me how that relates to your artwork, music, or anything?
Let's recap here.
You noted that he used dragoons in your game.
You threatened to cry "plagiarism" if his dragoons were similar enough to yours, as evidenced here.
I use the class "Dragoon" in my game in a certain fashion, so if I ever read up on this, I have a limited copyright on my game material and will report you for plagiarism. So hopefully the way you shape the actual class will be unique for the game and not a copy off mine, Legend of Dragoon, and the way Final Fantasy interprets dragoons
You then went on to assure him that he seemed fine, and that you probably wouldn't have to.
The issue here is that you're claiming ownership for something you do not own. You never said anything about your materials or your story, you just set about to guarding the very concept of the dragoon. Claiming that you
haven't isn't a very good argument when it's so readily apparent that that's exactly the gist of that little clause in your post.
Stop acting like we "misread" it. Either we're reading it correctly on the points that matter, or you have a mountain man's understanding of words and their meanings.
Stop defending yourself with things that contradict the initial evidence, it's bad form. :x