Envision, Create, Share

Welcome to HBGames, a leading amateur game development forum and Discord server. All are welcome, and amongst our ranks you will find experts in their field from all aspects of video game design and development.

Starcraft II, or how I stopped worrying and...

e

Sponsor

Starcraft II, or how I stopped worrying and learned to love WANs.

It was confirmed that Blizzard is dropping built-in LAN support for Starcraft II.

This means all multiplayer games (legit ones) will have to go through Battle.net.

Seriously? Seriously. Regardless of the fact that, obviously, LAN games (that is, a bunch of people playing together on the same network, using the same outgoing IP) are tons faster than games through Bnet, Blizzard stated that it would give the community something much better than LAN (apparently Battle.net, but that's an outright lie right now, so we'll just wait and see).

Some people have speculated that LAN will still be supported, but that the game will require you to identify through Battle.net before later falling back onto LAN mode. Most Blizzard RTS already follow a similar method; they connect through Battle.net and then, after the game starts, the "host" becomes the server, connecting everybody together and syncing the game. That's admittedly faster than having every packet go through the BNet servers, but it's still slower than a straight LAN. On a LAN, packets never go beyond one hop: from the sender to the router/switch to the receiver. Assuming people connect through BNet, then they're connected to each other, but they are on a LAN, then they're outgoing IP will be the same; they will still end packets to that IP, and the router, unaware that that IP is within its subnet, will send it along until someone returns it back. So it still goes out of the local network.

Maybe they'll implement some sort of half-assed LAN mode, where you authenticate through BNet and the software filters packet to efficiently keep them in the same network if it notices that two players share the same IP. I doubt it.

I also don't buy the whole piracy excuse; I highly doubt piracy in direct relation to LAN games. Most pirated copies allow you to play on BNet.

Either way, I'll be throwing my weight behind PvPGN if Blizzard don't revise their position, and hope that a SC2 patch can be made as fast as possible.

This is a ridiculous method to counter piracy, when they full well know they'll make millions on the game.
 

Vadon

Member

I don't have anything to comment on as far as the content of this thread is concerned. I just wanted to throw a high-five for the Dr. Strangelove reference.

Actually, I do have a small comment, I suppose. While I'm not sure that I'll be getting SCII (My computer kind of, um... sucks.), I do agree that this is a silly way to counteract piracy.
 

Zeriab

Sponsor

Haven't they learned anything from Spore?
Stupid piracy protection schemes => more piracy.

A quality-assurance initiative? :haha:
Unless of course they mean to reduce quality by restricting the gamers choices.

I guess it's not totally unexpected seeing as there will be no LAN support for Diablo 3 either, but still I would argue that no LAN support in SC2 is worse.
 

Thank you for viewing

HBGames is a leading amateur video game development forum and Discord server open to all ability levels. Feel free to have a nosey around!

Discord

Join our growing and active Discord server to discuss all aspects of game making in a relaxed environment. Join Us

Content

  • Our Games
  • Games in Development
  • Emoji by Twemoji.
    Top