Envision, Create, Share

Welcome to HBGames, a leading amateur game development forum and Discord server. All are welcome, and amongst our ranks you will find experts in their field from all aspects of video game design and development.

Post your Personality!

ENTP
Extraverted Intuitive Thinking Perceiving

11 75 50 44


Career Educational Institutions
Science/Technical
Natural Science
High School Education
Information System Specialist
Engineering
Management
Finance
Technical Counseling
Famous people of your particular type
Michaelangelo, Richard Feynman, Thomas Edison, Hypatia of Alexandria

Qualitative analysis of your type formula

You are:
slightly expressed extravert
distinctively expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
moderately expressed perceiving personality

I'm an inventor! :specs: But I hate biology (Natural sciences for the US I think) with a passion.
 
slightly expressed extravert

slightly expressed sensing personality

moderately expressed feeling personality

slightly expressed judging personality
 

EpE

Member

Introverted 56
Sensing 12
Feeling 12
Judging 44

The Champion
We are lucky that Protectors make up as much as ten percent the population, because their primary interest is in the safety and security of those they care about - their family, their circle of friends, their students, their patients, their boss, their fellow-workers, or their employees. Protectors have an extraordinary sense of loyalty and responsibility in their makeup, and seem fulfilled in the degree they can shield others from the dirt and dangers of the world. Speculating and experimenting do not intrigue Protectors, who prefer to make do with time-honored and time-tested products and procedures rather than change to new. At work Protectors are seldom happy in situations where the rules are constantly changing, or where long-established ways of doing things are not respected. For their part, Protectors value tradition, both in the culture and in their family. Protectors believe deeply in the stability of social ranking conferred by birth, titles, offices, and credentials. And they cherish family history and enjoy caring for family property, from houses to heirlooms.

Wanting to be of service to others, Protectors find great satisfaction in assisting the downtrodden, and can deal with disability and neediness in others better than any other type. They are not as outgoing and talkative as the Provider Guardians [ESFJs], and their shyness is often misjudged as stiffness, even coldness, when in truth Protectors are warm-hearted and sympathetic, giving happily of themselves to those in need.

Their reserve ought really to be seen as an expression of their sincerity and seriousness of purpose. The most diligent of all the types, Protectors are willing to work long, hard hours quietly doing all the thankless jobs that others manage to avoid. Protectors are quite happy working alone; in fact, in positions of authority they may try to do everything themselves rather than direct others to get the job done. Thoroughness and frugality are also virtues for them. When Protectors undertake a task, they will complete it if humanly possible. They also know better than any other type the value of a dollar, and they abhor the squandering or misuse of money. To save, to put something aside against an unpredictable future, to prepare for emergencies-these are actions near and dear to the Protector's heart. For all these reasons, Protectors are frequently overworked, just as they are frequently misunderstood and undervalued. Their contributions, and also their economies, are often taken for granted, and they rarely get the gratitude they deserve.

Mother Teresa, George H.W. Bush, Jimmy Stewart, and Tsar Nicholas II are examples of Protector Guardian style.

You are:

* moderately expressed introvert
* slightly expressed sensing personality
* slightly expressed feeling personality
* moderately expressed judging personality

hmmmm sounds like im protector of things and only 10% of people are in this category o.0

yay! I was suspecting something less important xD

EDIT I Got another result here xD

 

Shizu

Sponsor

162233.png


This test was rather amusing.
 
161762.png


I've seen just as many religious T's as I've seen F's.
He's all right, I'm Christian Evangelist, practicing my religion (I say that cause some religious people live their religion only when it suits them) and I'm T and programmer...
 
I always find these tests misleadig, as personally I get bored after 50 or so questions so start answering at random or not really paying attention. Get a different result every time.
 
RPG-man":1gmidray said:
I've seen just as many religious T's as I've seen F's.
He's all right, I'm Christian Evangelist, practicing my religion (I say that cause some religious people live their religion only when it suits them) and I'm T and programmer...

How do you live with that compartmentalization? You apply logic stringently in one area of your life, and then completely forsake it in another. It sounds painful.

Also, here is me according to the test all the cool kids are taking, along with a way cooler colour scheme:



eta: I am proud that I am apparently 100% introverted. I think this makes me better as a person.
 

mawk

Sponsor

religion and logic aren't mutually exclusive. it just depends on your worldview. the idea of invisible people in the sky who grant wishes might not fit with life as you see it, but different people have different views on the order of things

don't be a coolkid atheist dogg

being a really superior atheist is just as bad as being a really superior theist imo and since your main point about religion is that it's mental pablum force-fed to the masses well
 
mawk":1xgkgfyd said:
religion and logic aren't mutually exclusive. it just depends on your worldview. the idea of invisible people in the sky who grant wishes might not fit with life as you see it, but different people have different views on the order of things

don't be a coolkid atheist dogg

being a really superior atheist is just as bad as being a really superior theist imo and since your main point about religion is that it's mental pablum force-fed to the masses well

I'm not a coolkid, dogg. Nor am I superior. I just think it's silly to believe in things that are blatantly false, like invisible people in the sky granting wishes. That should conflict with any worldview that's remotely based on reality as it is.
 

mawk

Sponsor

Nor am I superior.
[...] it's silly to believe in things that are blatantly false, like invisible people in the sky granting wishes. That should conflict with any worldview that's remotely based on reality as it is.
you were talking about logic there for a second what happened

you can believe what you want but when you start quibbling about how anyone who believes otherwise is weakminded then things start to sound really familiar
 

Tindy

Sponsor

Extraversion

Extraversion is marked by pronounced engagement with the external world. Extraverts enjoy being with people, are full of energy, and often experience positive emotions. They tend to be enthusiastic, action-oriented, individuals who are likely to say "Yes!" or "Let's go!" to opportunities for excitement. In groups they like to talk, assert themselves, and draw attention to themselves.

Introverts lack the exuberance, energy, and activity levels of extraverts. They tend to be quiet, low-key, deliberate, and disengaged from the social world. Their lack of social involvement should not be interpreted as shyness or depression; the introvert simply needs less stimulation than an extravert and prefers to be alone. The independence and reserve of the introvert is sometimes mistaken as unfriendliness or arrogance. In reality, an introvert who scores high on the agreeableness dimension will not seek others out but will be quite pleasant when approached.

Domain/Facet............ Score

Extraversion...............2

Friendliness.............10

Gregariousness...........32

Assertiveness............30

Activity Level...........0

Excitement-Seeking.......3

Cheerfulness.............10

Your score on Extraversion is low, indicating you are introverted, reserved, and quiet. You enjoy solitude and solitary activities. Your socializing tends to be restricted to a few close friends.

Extraversion Facets

* Friendliness. Friendly people genuinely like other people and openly demonstrate positive feelings toward others. They make friends quickly and it is easy for them to form close, intimate relationships. Low scorers on Friendliness are not necessarily cold and hostile, but they do not reach out to others and are perceived as distant and reserved. Your level of friendliness is low.
* Gregariousness. Gregarious people find the company of others pleasantly stimulating and rewarding. They enjoy the excitement of crowds. Low scorers tend to feel overwhelmed by, and therefore actively avoid, large crowds. They do not necessarily dislike being with people sometimes, but their need for privacy and time to themselves is much greater than for individuals who score high on this scale. Your level of gregariousness is low.
* Assertiveness. High scorers Assertiveness like to speak out, take charge, and direct the activities of others. They tend to be leaders in groups. Low scorers tend not to talk much and let others control the activities of groups. Your level of assertiveness is low.
* Activity Level. Active individuals lead fast-paced, busy lives. They move about quickly, energetically, and vigorously, and they are involved in many activities. People who score low on this scale follow a slower and more leisurely, relaxed pace. Your activity level is low.
* Excitement-Seeking. High scorers on this scale are easily bored without high levels of stimulation. They love bright lights and hustle and bustle. They are likely to take risks and seek thrills. Low scorers are overwhelmed by noise and commotion and are adverse to thrill-seeking. Your level of excitement-seeking is low.
* Cheerfulness. This scale measures positive mood and feelings, not negative emotions (which are a part of the Neuroticism domain). Persons who score high on this scale typically experience a range of positive feelings, including happiness, enthusiasm, optimism, and joy. Low scorers are not as prone to such energetic, high spirits. Your level of positive emotions is low.

Agreeableness

Agreeableness reflects individual differences in concern with cooperation and social harmony. Agreeable individuals value getting along with others. They are therefore considerate, friendly, generous, helpful, and willing to compromise their interests with others'. Agreeable people also have an optimistic view of human nature. They believe people are basically honest, decent, and trustworthy.

Disagreeable individuals place self-interest above getting along with others. They are generally unconcerned with others' well-being, and therefore are unlikely to extend themselves for other people. Sometimes their skepticism about others' motives causes them to be suspicious, unfriendly, and uncooperative.

Agreeableness is obviously advantageous for attaining and maintaining popularity. Agreeable people are better liked than disagreeable people. On the other hand, agreeableness is not useful in situations that require tough or absolute objective decisions. Disagreeable people can make excellent scientists, critics, or soldiers.

Domain/Facet............ Score

Agreeableness..............23

Trust....................2

Morality.................36

Altruism.................54

Cooperation..............60

Modesty..................47

Sympathy.................9

Your score on Agreeableness is low, indicating less concern with others' needs Than with your own. People see you as tough, critical, and uncompromising.

Agreeableness Facets

* Trust. A person with high trust assumes that most people are fair, honest, and have good intentions. Persons low in trust see others as selfish, devious, and potentially dangerous. Your level of trust is low.
* Morality. High scorers on this scale see no need for pretense or manipulation when dealing with others and are therefore candid, frank, and sincere. Low scorers believe that a certain amount of deception in social relationships is necessary. People find it relatively easy to relate to the straightforward high-scorers on this scale. They generally find it more difficult to relate to the unstraightforward low-scorers on this scale. It should be made clear that low scorers are not unprincipled or immoral; they are simply more guarded and less willing to openly reveal the whole truth. Your level of morality is average.
* Altruism. Altruistic people find helping other people genuinely rewarding. Consequently, they are generally willing to assist those who are in need. Altruistic people find that doing things for others is a form of self-fulfillment rather than self-sacrifice. Low scorers on this scale do not particularly like helping those in need. Requests for help feel like an imposition rather than an opportunity for self-fulfillment. Your level of altruism is average.
* Cooperation. Individuals who score high on this scale dislike confrontations. They are perfectly willing to compromise or to deny their own needs in order to get along with others. Those who score low on this scale are more likely to intimidate others to get their way. Your level of compliance is average.
* Modesty. High scorers on this scale do not like to claim that they are better than other people. In some cases this attitude may derive from low self-confidence or self-esteem. Nonetheless, some people with high self-esteem find immodesty unseemly. Those who are willing to describe themselves as superior tend to be seen as disagreeably arrogant by other people. Your level of modesty is average.
* Sympathy. People who score high on this scale are tenderhearted and compassionate. They feel the pain of others vicariously and are easily moved to pity. Low scorers are not affected strongly by human suffering. They pride themselves on making objective judgments based on reason. They are more concerned with truth and impartial justice than with mercy. Your level of tender-mindedness is low.

Conscientiousness

Conscientiousness concerns the way in which we control, regulate, and direct our impulses. Impulses are not inherently bad; occasionally time constraints require a snap decision, and acting on our first impulse can be an effective response. Also, in times of play rather than work, acting spontaneously and impulsively can be fun. Impulsive individuals can be seen by others as colorful, fun-to-be-with, and zany.

Nonetheless, acting on impulse can lead to trouble in a number of ways. Some impulses are antisocial. Uncontrolled antisocial acts not only harm other members of society, but also can result in retribution toward the perpetrator of such impulsive acts. Another problem with impulsive acts is that they often produce immediate rewards but undesirable, long-term consequences. Examples include excessive socializing that leads to being fired from one's job, hurling an insult that causes the breakup of an important relationship, or using pleasure-inducing drugs that eventually destroy one's health.

Impulsive behavior, even when not seriously destructive, diminishes a person's effectiveness in significant ways. Acting impulsively disallows contemplating alternative courses of action, some of which would have been wiser than the impulsive choice. Impulsivity also sidetracks people during projects that require organized sequences of steps or stages. Accomplishments of an impulsive person are therefore small, scattered, and inconsistent.

A hallmark of intelligence, what potentially separates human beings from earlier life forms, is the ability to think about future consequences before acting on an impulse. Intelligent activity involves contemplation of long-range goals, organizing and planning routes to these goals, and persisting toward one's goals in the face of short-lived impulses to the contrary. The idea that intelligence involves impulse control is nicely captured by the term prudence, an alternative label for the Conscientiousness domain. Prudent means both wise and cautious. Persons who score high on the Conscientiousness scale are, in fact, perceived by others as intelligent.

The benefits of high conscientiousness are obvious. Conscientious individuals avoid trouble and achieve high levels of success through purposeful planning and persistence. They are also positively regarded by others as intelligent and reliable. On the negative side, they can be compulsive perfectionists and workaholics. Furthermore, extremely conscientious individuals might be regarded as stuffy and boring. Unconscientious people may be criticized for their unreliability, lack of ambition, and failure to stay within the lines, but they will experience many short-lived pleasures and they will never be called stuffy.

Domain/Facet............ Score

Conscientiousness..........34

Self-Efficacy............19

Orderliness..............81

Dutifulness..............29

Achievement-Striving.....22

Self-Discipline..........6

Cautiousness.............60

Your score on Conscientiousness is average. This means you are reasonably reliable, organized, and self-controlled.

Conscientiousness Facets

* Self-Efficacy. Self-Efficacy describes confidence in one's ability to accomplish things. High scorers believe they have the intelligence (common sense), drive, and self-control necessary for achieving success. Low scorers do not feel effective, and may have a sense that they are not in control of their lives. Your level of self-efficacy is low.
* Orderliness. Persons with high scores on orderliness are well-organized. They like to live according to routines and schedules. They keep lists and make plans. Low scorers tend to be disorganized and scattered. Your level of orderliness is high.
* Dutifulness. This scale reflects the strength of a person's sense of duty and obligation. Those who score high on this scale have a strong sense of moral obligation. Low scorers find contracts, rules, and regulations overly confining. They are likely to be seen as unreliable or even irresponsible. Your level of dutifulness is low.
* Achievement-Striving. Individuals who score high on this scale strive hard to achieve excellence. Their drive to be recognized as successful keeps them on track toward their lofty goals. They often have a strong sense of direction in life, but extremely high scores may be too single-minded and obsessed with their work. Low scorers are content to get by with a minimal amount of work, and might be seen by others as lazy. Your level of achievement striving is low.
* Self-Discipline. Self-discipline-what many people call will-power-refers to the ability to persist at difficult or unpleasant tasks until they are completed. People who possess high self-discipline are able to overcome reluctance to begin tasks and stay on track despite distractions. Those with low self-discipline procrastinate and show poor follow-through, often failing to complete tasks-even tasks they want very much to complete. Your level of self-discipline is low.
* Cautiousness. Cautiousness describes the disposition to think through possibilities before acting. High scorers on the Cautiousness scale take their time when making decisions. Low scorers often say or do first thing that comes to mind without deliberating alternatives and the probable consequences of those alternatives. Your level of cautiousness is average.

Neuroticism

Freud originally used the term neurosis to describe a condition marked by mental distress, emotional suffering, and an inability to cope effectively with the normal demands of life. He suggested that everyone shows some signs of neurosis, but that we differ in our degree of suffering and our specific symptoms of distress. Today neuroticism refers to the tendency to experience negative feelings. Those who score high on Neuroticism may experience primarily one specific negative feeling such as anxiety, anger, or depression, but are likely to experience several of these emotions. People high in neuroticism are emotionally reactive. They respond emotionally to events that would not affect most people, and their reactions tend to be more intense than normal. They are more likely to interpret ordinary situations as threatening, and minor frustrations as hopelessly difficult. Their negative emotional reactions tend to persist for unusually long periods of time, which means they are often in a bad mood. These problems in emotional regulation can diminish a neurotic's ability to think clearly, make decisions, and cope effectively with stress.

At the other end of the scale, individuals who score low in neuroticism are less easily upset and are less emotionally reactive. They tend to be calm, emotionally stable, and free from persistent negative feelings. Freedom from negative feelings does not mean that low scorers experience a lot of positive feelings; frequency of positive emotions is a component of the Extraversion domain.

Domain/Facet............ Score

Neuroticism................86

Anxiety..................83

Anger....................49

Depression...............74

Self-Consciousness.......83

Immoderation.............91

Vulnerability............76

Your score on Neuroticism is high, indicating that you are easily upset, even by what most people consider the normal demands of living. People consider you to be sensitive and emotional.

Neuroticism Facets

* Anxiety. The "fight-or-flight" system of the brain of anxious individuals is too easily and too often engaged. Therefore, people who are high in anxiety often feel like something dangerous is about to happen. They may be afraid of specific situations or be just generally fearful. They feel tense, jittery, and nervous. Persons low in Anxiety are generally calm and fearless. Your level of anxiety is high.
* Anger. Persons who score high in Anger feel enraged when things do not go their way. They are sensitive about being treated fairly and feel resentful and bitter when they feel they are being cheated. This scale measures the tendency to feel angry; whether or not the person expresses annoyance and hostility depends on the individual's level on Agreeableness. Low scorers do not get angry often or easily. Your level of anger is average.
* Depression. This scale measures the tendency to feel sad, dejected, and discouraged. High scorers lack energy and have difficult initiating activities. Low scorers tend to be free from these depressive feelings. Your level of depression is high.
* Self-Consciousness. Self-conscious individuals are sensitive about what others think of them. Their concern about rejection and ridicule cause them to feel shy and uncomfortable abound others. They are easily embarrassed and often feel ashamed. Their fears that others will criticize or make fun of them are exaggerated and unrealistic, but their awkwardness and discomfort may make these fears a self-fulfilling prophecy. Low scorers, in contrast, do not suffer from the mistaken impression that everyone is watching and judging them. They do not feel nervous in social situations. Your level or self-consciousness is high.
* Immoderation. Immoderate individuals feel strong cravings and urges that they have difficulty resisting. They tend to be oriented toward short-term pleasures and rewards rather than long- term consequences. Low scorers do not experience strong, irresistible cravings and consequently do not find themselves tempted to overindulge. Your level of immoderation is high.
* Vulnerability. High scorers on Vulnerability experience panic, confusion, and helplessness when under pressure or stress. Low scorers feel more poised, confident, and clear-thinking when stressed. Your level of vulnerability is high.

Openness to Experience

Openness to Experience describes a dimension of cognitive style that distinguishes imaginative, creative people from down-to-earth, conventional people. Open people are intellectually curious, appreciative of art, and sensitive to beauty. They tend to be, compared to closed people, more aware of their feelings. They tend to think and act in individualistic and nonconforming ways. Intellectuals typically score high on Openness to Experience; consequently, this factor has also been called Culture or Intellect. Nonetheless, Intellect is probably best regarded as one aspect of openness to experience. Scores on Openness to Experience are only modestly related to years of education and scores on standard intelligent tests.

Another characteristic of the open cognitive style is a facility for thinking in symbols and abstractions far removed from concrete experience. Depending on the individual's specific intellectual abilities, this symbolic cognition may take the form of mathematical, logical, or geometric thinking, artistic and metaphorical use of language, music composition or performance, or one of the many visual or performing arts. People with low scores on openness to experience tend to have narrow, common interests. They prefer the plain, straightforward, and obvious over the complex, ambiguous, and subtle. They may regard the arts and sciences with suspicion, regarding these endeavors as abstruse or of no practical use. Closed people prefer familiarity over novelty; they are conservative and resistant to change.

Openness is often presented as healthier or more mature by psychologists, who are often themselves open to experience. However, open and closed styles of thinking are useful in different environments. The intellectual style of the open person may serve a professor well, but research has shown that closed thinking is related to superior job performance in police work, sales, and a number of service occupations.

Domain/Facet............ Score

Openess to experience.....26

Imagination..............27

Artistic Interests.......50

Emotionality.............16

Adventurousness..........29

Intellect................39

Liberalism...............47

Your score on Openness to Experience is low, indicating you like to think in plain and simple terms. Others describe you as down-to-earth, practical,and conservative.

Openess Facets

* Imagination. To imaginative individuals, the real world is often too plain and ordinary. High scorers on this scale use fantasy as a way of creating a richer, more interesting world. Low scorers are on this scale are more oriented to facts than fantasy. Your level of imagination is low.
* Artistic Interests. High scorers on this scale love beauty, both in art and in nature. They become easily involved and absorbed in artistic and natural events. They are not necessarily artistically trained nor talented, although many will be. The defining features of this scale are interest in, and appreciation of natural and artificial beauty. Low scorers lack aesthetic sensitivity and interest in the arts. Your level of artistic interests is average.
* Emotionality. Persons high on Emotionality have good access to and awareness of their own feelings. Low scorers are less aware of their feelings and tend not to express their emotions openly. Your level of emotionality is low.
* Adventurousness. High scorers on adventurousness are eager to try new activities, travel to foreign lands, and experience different things. They find familiarity and routine boring, and will take a new route home just because it is different. Low scorers tend to feel uncomfortable with change and prefer familiar routines. Your level of adventurousness is low.
* Intellect. Intellect and artistic interests are the two most important, central aspects of openness to experience. High scorers on Intellect love to play with ideas. They are open-minded to new and unusual ideas, and like to debate intellectual issues. They enjoy riddles, puzzles, and brain teasers. Low scorers on Intellect prefer dealing with either people or things rather than ideas. They regard intellectual exercises as a waste of time. Intellect should not be equated with intelligence. Intellect is an intellectual style, not an intellectual ability, although high scorers on Intellect score slightly higher than low-Intellect individuals on standardized intelligence tests. Your level of intellect is average.
* Liberalism. Psychological liberalism refers to a readiness to challenge authority, convention, and traditional values. In its most extreme form, psychological liberalism can even represent outright hostility toward rules, sympathy for law-breakers, and love of ambiguity, chaos, and disorder. Psychological conservatives prefer the security and stability brought by conformity to tradition. Psychological liberalism and conservatism are not identical to political affiliation, but certainly incline individuals toward certain political parties. Your level of liberalism is average.

*Keep in mind that I've had a crappy day. So uh... the answers'd probably change if I were in better spirits.
 
mawk":35rkm5zw said:
religion and logic aren't mutually exclusive. it just depends on your worldview. the idea of invisible people in the sky who grant wishes might not fit with life as you see it, but different people have different views on the order of things

I misunderstood what you were referring to with worldview and I missed your point entirely here the first time around, sorry. You're right.

I do think I was wrong to say that religion and logical thinking are mutually exclusive. Any logical argument always starts from a certain set of assumptions. A perfectly logical person could be religious, as long as their religion was internally consistent with whatever assumptions that person has.

My problem with religion is that I don't see the assumptions as being consistent with reality, but that is unrelated to how intelligent a person is, and rather an issue of having different data available to us.
 
# very expressed introvert (89)
# moderately expressed sensing personality (25)
# moderately expressed thinking personality (25)
# moderately expressed judging personality (44)

Ouch. That's very introverted. Only Venetia seems to have got close to that.


As for my specific personality, I'd say:

Positives

* Loyal
* Helpful
* Friendly
* Determined

Negatives

* Lack of self belief
* Shy
* Judgemental
 
I just think it's silly to believe in things that are blatantly false, like invisible people in the sky granting wishes. That should conflict with any worldview that's remotely based on reality as it is.
You didn't see that I saw, didn't feel that I felt, so, don't say that I believe in is blatantly false, if you don't know that I know, and you don't see the truth.
I know a lot of people like you, and, I see they think in reverse compared to Christians, because they think with the world's spirit, so, they can't see the truth, or it doesn't appear obvious for them. Trust me or not, but a lot of things changed in my father's life since he knew God, and in mine since I began to live with God. And I'm not the only one ! :)

It's my opinion, but you think that you think ;)
I just ask you not to blasphemy ;)
 
RPG-man":f8s27pi8 said:
I just think it's silly to believe in things that are blatantly false, like invisible people in the sky granting wishes. That should conflict with any worldview that's remotely based on reality as it is.
You didn't see that I saw, didn't feel that I felt, so, don't say that I believe in is blatantly false, if you don't know that I know, and you don't see the truth.

Here is an example of how our basic assumptions about the world differ. I don't base my beliefs off of feelings. If I did (and I used to) I would be Christian, since I had a "religious experience" once. But it was just feelings, and as far as I can see those are extremely deceptive. One need only look at someone who is clinically depressed to see how unreliable feelings are, or someone who is on lsd to see how unreliable what you see is. I'll agree to disagree here.

I know a lot of people like you, and, I see they think in reverse compared to Christians, because they think with the world's spirit, so, they can't see the truth, or it doesn't appear obvious for them.

What does this even mean?

Trust me or not, but a lot of things changed in my father's life since he knew God, and in mine since I began to live with God. And I'm not the only one ! :)

A lot of things changed in my life for the better since I stopped believing in God. But that is no more convincing to you than yours is to me.

It's my opinion, but you think that you think ;)
I just ask you not to blasphemy ;)

I'll blasphemy as much as I want, thanks. You're free to ignore me if I cause you greif.
 

mawk

Sponsor

let's not religious argument anymore

religious argument is like putting pants on your face
it makes us all look like buttheads
ha ha ha
 
Hey, you don't understand that I don't expect you to become Christian thanks to me :).
I just say that I think, that's all.

I don't base my beliefs off of feelings.
You don't remember that I'm a thinker, and my beliefs are not based on my feelings -but they comfort my beliefs-. At the beginning I doubted on God's existence, but some events like healings -including my father's healing of a Hepatitis B in a day, after he goes to church- and some experiences made me trusting in God.

A lot of things changed in my life for the better since I stopped believing in God. But that is no more convincing to you than yours is to me.
Time ago, my father left God for ten years, and everything in his life changed for the worst.

You're free to ignore me if I cause you greif.
You don't cause me grief, but I'm sad that you are (for me) in the wrong way.
And I know I won't convince you. ;)
 

Thank you for viewing

HBGames is a leading amateur video game development forum and Discord server open to all ability levels. Feel free to have a nosey around!

Discord

Join our growing and active Discord server to discuss all aspects of game making in a relaxed environment. Join Us

Content

  • Our Games
  • Games in Development
  • Emoji by Twemoji.
    Top