Envision, Create, Share

Welcome to HBGames, a leading amateur game development forum and Discord server. All are welcome, and amongst our ranks you will find experts in their field from all aspects of video game design and development.

Necrophilia or Pedophilia?

Necro or Pedo

  • Pedophile

    Votes: 21 72.4%
  • Necrophile

    Votes: 8 27.6%

  • Total voters
    29
Status
Not open for further replies.

Gray

Member

Today a random thought entered my head. Is it worse to be a necrophile, or a pedophile?

For those who don't know what a necrophile is, it's a person who is compelled to sleep with those whom are deceased. Or, fucking dead people. Disgusting, I know.

All stories of necrophilia that I've heard of, the Necrophilac killed the victim first. You'd have to be demented enough to kill someone first, to be demented enough to sleep with them.

However, some may feel that Pedophilia is worse. If you are one of theese people, state your reasons.
If you have none, just post anyways.

I personaly think that Pedophilia is better. Why? I'd rather be raped; over being killed, then raped.
 
Gray":3styf3ty said:
I personaly think that Pedophilia is better. Why? I'd rather be raped; over being killed, then raped.

I agree 100% with you on this. If someone wants to kill me then rape me, I would like to know though...because it would be funny.

~RadethDart
 
Necro. Sure it's wierd, but pedophilia is fucking disgusting. It's a matter of perception. Both victims are helpless, and both must offer some strange sensational value.
 
Actually In my opinion Pedophilia is worse,
Pedophilia is sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children which is fucking disgusting
it means you want to fuck people who don't even know what fucking is O.o
And furthermore 99% of the time it scars the molested for life...

But the most disgusting thing about it is:
that the most of the time people who commit pedophilia are retards with low self esteem
Several researchers have reported correlations between pedophilia and certain psychological characteristics, such as low self-esteem[28][29] and poor social skills.[30] Beginning in 2002, other researchers began reporting a series of findings linking pedophilia with brain structure and function: Pedophilic (and hebephilic) men have lower IQs,[3][31][32] poorer scores on memory tests,[31] greater rates of non-right-handedness,[3][31][33][34] greater rates of school grade failure over and above the IQ differences,[35] lesser physical height,[36] greater probability of having suffered childhood head injuries resulting in unconsciousness,[37][38] and several differences in MRI-detected brain structures.[39][40][41] They report that their findings suggest that there are one or more neurological characteristics present at birth that cause or increase the likelihood of being pedophilic. Evidence of familial transmittability "suggests, but does not prove that genetic factors are responsible" for the development of pedophilia.[42]

Another study, using structural MRI, shows that pedophilic men have a lower volume of white matter than non-sexual criminals.[39]

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has shown that child molesters diagnosed with pedophilia have reduced activation of the hypothalamus as compared with non-pedophilic persons when viewing sexually arousing pictures of adults.[43] A 2008 functional neuroimaging study notes that central processing of sexual stimuli in heterosexual "paedophile forensic inpatients" may be altered by a disturbance in the prefrontal networks, which "may be associated with stimulus-controlled behaviours, such as sexual compulsive behaviours." The findings may also suggest "a dysfunction at the cognitive stage of sexual arousal processing."[44]

Blanchard, Cantor, and Robichaud (2006) reviewed the research that attempted to identify hormonal aspects of pedophiles.[45] They concluded that there is some evidence that pedophilic men have less testosterone than controls, but that the research is of poor quality and that it is difficult to draw any firm conclusion from it.

While not causes of pedophilia themselves, comorbid psychiatric illnesses—such as personality disorders and substance abuse—are risk factors for acting on pedophilic urges.[6] Blanchard, Cantor, and Robichaud (2006) noted about comorbid psychiatric illnesses that, "The theoretical implications are not so clear. Do particular genes or noxious factors in the prenatal environment predispose a male to develop both affective disorders and pedophilia, or do the frustration, danger, and isolation engendered by unacceptable sexual desires—or their occasional furtive satisfaction—lead to anxiety and despair?"[45] They indicated that, because they previously found mothers of pedophiles to be more likely to have undergone psychiatric treatment,[37] the genetic possibility is more likely.

Necrophilia on the other is more mixed...
Rosman and Resnick (1989) reviewed information from 34 cases of necrophilia describing the individuals' motivations for their behaviors: these individuals reported the desire to possess an unresisting and unrejecting partner (68%), reunions with a romantic partner (21%), sexual attraction to corpses (15%), comfort or overcoming feelings of isolation (15%), or seeking self-esteem by expressing power over a homicide victim (12%).[3]
only 12% are actually out there fucking homicide victims (or at least admit to it)
On the other hand 68% simply don't want to be rejected
(Its fucking disgusting still, but then again we've all been rejected before)
And furthermore 21% (so a total of 89% of these people aren't serial killers) just want to be reunited with a dead partner,
which though... ...odd... ...is perfectly understandable and
furthermore isn't really bad as this is someone they've fucked before
And finally the person is dead, and at this point won't really give a shit, so it definitively won't scar them

And some more things confirming this:
Pedophilia does not appear in nature (or at least I haven't dug up any studies showing that it does)
while Necrophilia does:
Upon inspection, he discovered a drake (male) mallard lying dead about two meters from the building. Next to the downed bird there was a second drake mallard standing close by. As Moeliker observed the couple, the living drake picked at the corpse of the dead one for a few minutes and then mounted the corpse and began copulating with it. The act of necrophilia lasted for about 75 minutes, in which time, according to Moeliker, the living drake took two short breaks before resuming with copulating behavior. Moeliker surmised that at the time of the collision with the window the two mallards were engaged in a common pattern in duck behavior which is called rape flight. "When one died the other one just went for it and didn't get any negative feedback -- well, didn't get any feedback," according to Moeliker.[11][12] This is the first recorded case of necrophilia in the mallard duck- though not the only recorded case of homosexuality within the bird family.[13]

In the case of a praying mantis, necrophilia could be said to be part of their methods of reproduction. The larger female will often decapitate or even eat her mate during copulation.[14] However, given that the sexual activity of a male mantis is controlled by a brain-like ganglion in his abdomen it may not be appropriate to refer to him as a "corpse", even when he is decapitated.[citation needed]

The government also confirms this as Pedophilia is a felony in all 50 states hands down
(and has federal laws against it)
While necrophilia has no federal laws determining its status, thus it varies,
and furthermore it is not illegal at all in the states of Minnesota and Nevada

So in the end, in my opinion, both are fucking gross,
but Necrophilia is more understandable, and possibly forgivable,
therefore being the lesser of the two evils...
 

mawk

Sponsor

necrophilia doesn't run implicitly with killing people. my thoughts are you heard those stories because they involved a murder; just a story where some guy bones a dead chick is embarrasing to read and embarrassing to write, and those kinds of crimes are really some of the least newsworthy. all sexual fixations have some form of violence at their extremes, but that violence doesn't carry through the entire thing.

opinion? pedophilia's worse. you're taking advantage of someone/thing with no means to resist either way, but a corpse isn't really going to be affected the way a kid is. I'm not gonna be using my body anymore when I'm dead, and I really couldn't give two shits what people do with it after it's stopped being me and started being a handsome bit of meat and bone.
 
Velocir_X":2hrdksqq said:
only 12% (of necrophiles) are actually out there fucking homicide victims (or at least admit to it)

I wonder how the other 88% are stumbling upon dead bodies so easily. Sexy ones at that.
 

mawk

Sponsor

I guess no one told you yet, but burying your dead is strictly a western european tradition. everywhere else, we simply auction off the corpse. don't ask, don't tell.
 

Gray

Member

Calibre":2zj5kfx2 said:
I can understand why there would be female necros... they'd be fucking guys that could stay stiff for longer than 5 minutes.

XD wait that's totally in appropriate oh my god i'm going to hell D: :angel:
 
Have you considered that someone can pretty much perform both necrophilia and pedophilia simultaneously. I know if a childs dead, it's not strictly a child anymore, but still.

fucking dead people is hardly inappropriate. get married, you'll be hard pressed to tell the difference.
 
Necrophilias doesn't mean killed then raped. (that has probably been mentioned but I'm tired!)
Some random harmless dude could go into a graveyard and have sex with a corpse. That's a LOT better then pedophilia.
 

Vadon

Member

A point of clarification! Necrophilia by definition is having the fetish stem from the fact that they're dead. It's an arousal to death, not their "sexiness." If you're not fetishing over their death, it's not necrophilia. So this principle of not letting a sexy person go to waste when they're dead may not even be technical necrophilia. You're not aroused by their death, but some other thing. Sure, you'd hope that their death would be enough to deter the stimulation, but it might not be.

That being said, both of these fetishes are depraved because of their origins. It's about an abuse of power and exerting your control. The fact that pedophilia involves children makes it worse.
 
Idk, I think I'd vote pedo over necro.

Wasn't it like in the olden times girls were married off at a really young age?

Speaking of which, anyone ever read the original Snow White story? She was only seven! The prince saw a dead seven year old and wanted to take her home with him. In the story he doesn't kiss her. The men drop the casket while carrying her away, dislodging the piece of poison apple from her throat. But they got married anyway.
Then again, the story never says how old the prince is either. And just because today marriage=sex doesn't mean that was the custom back then.
Just thought it was relevant.
 
It depends entirely on the sitiuation:

- Are you a child yourself? Then pedophilia is fine.
- Is it rape? Then pedo is not fine.
- Are you only a couple of years "out of range" (19 and 16 for example)? Then pedo is fine.
- Is it for the purposes of education? Then pedo is fine.

- Have they been dead for more than a few weeks? Then Necro is icky, though I guess fine.
- Do you have the consent of either the corpse or the family? Then necro is fine. (If not then it is still rape).
- Did you have permission to dig up their body? Then necro is fine.

I would actually say that pedo is better than necro, given that all of the conditions above are met. Simply because we are MEANT to go after the ones who can give us the best offspring - which is not necessarily age dependant, since everyone goes through puberty at a different time (ESPECIALLY in girls); therefore a 15 year old might be that optimum babymaker.
 

mawk

Sponsor

- Are you a child yourself? Then pedophilia is fine.
- Are you only a couple of years "out of range" (19 and 16 for example)? Then pedo is fine.
- Is it for the purposes of education? Then pedo is fine.
none of these situations could be classified as pedophilia. pedophilia isn't the act of having sex with someone below 18, it's the sexual fixation on people notably younger than you based solely on their age.

it's a fetish, not a verb.

also what @ "education"
 
ahem 16 to 19 isn't pedo
pedo is defined as wanting to fuck pre-pubescent children so those younger than like 12
don't get your facts wrong!
 
Hmm. I was talking more in the eyes of the law.

If we are going by actual definitions then I would still say Pedophilia is better, actually, for the same reasons I mentioned before.

And while I know it's a controversial statement to make, and not meaning to hurt anyone, I don't see what could possibly be traumatising or life-changing about sex. I think way too much thought is put into it. Sex is just sex. I'm not saying "YO GO AROUND RAPING KIDDIES" - consent is still an issue and needed in any case of intercourse, simply because you're doing something with someone's body. All the same, if both sides have consent and both sides know exactly what is going to happen then ~
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Thank you for viewing

HBGames is a leading amateur video game development forum and Discord server open to all ability levels. Feel free to have a nosey around!

Discord

Join our growing and active Discord server to discuss all aspects of game making in a relaxed environment. Join Us

Content

  • Our Games
  • Games in Development
  • Emoji by Twemoji.
    Top