Megadeth425
Member
Poverty is governmment-made. Sweatshops make immense profits by only paying their workers pennies an hour. Atheletes and actors negotiate contracts that give them more in a four month stretch than honest people doing an honesty job that provides some neccesary service can make in a year (some 19 year old with no concept of spending money gets a million dollar contract. Meanwhile, my stepdad works to make cables, things like electricity couldn't go through, and gets paid just enough for us to scrape by.). In his first term, Bush gave the richest 2% of the US populatin tax cuts. Now let's do the math. The richest, who're making tens of millions a year, get tax cuts, which puts a dent in how much money the country has to spend. Meanwhile, people who struggle for a few months so their taxes get paid, don't get tax cuts that could have a much smaller impact on how less money goes in.
Look at bottled water. For $1.25, you can go and get a bottle filled with what you can get for free from your tap.
You say that unless you're a very infinitecimal percentage of the population, so small that the odds of such a person existing are themselves infinitecimal, then you're poor because of your own fault. It can't be that you got laid off because your boss decided getting machines to do the work would be cheaper than getting people. It can't be that the small store you owned was driven out of business by a multi-billion dollar mega-mart. It can't be that you're living in a system that cares about two things: you dying for their glory, and you giving them your money.
Yes, people do throw away their lives. People fuck up, don't care, and end broke until they die. But to say that every person at poverty is like that because it's their fault, you prove the system has won.
And if you think rations and communism are the only alternatives to a greed-based, every-man-for-himself system, then I suggest you don't talk until you know what you're saying. Communism is the left-wing extreme, just as fascism and nazism is the left. There's a whole spectrum of ideals between what we have and communism.
Look at bottled water. For $1.25, you can go and get a bottle filled with what you can get for free from your tap.
You say that unless you're a very infinitecimal percentage of the population, so small that the odds of such a person existing are themselves infinitecimal, then you're poor because of your own fault. It can't be that you got laid off because your boss decided getting machines to do the work would be cheaper than getting people. It can't be that the small store you owned was driven out of business by a multi-billion dollar mega-mart. It can't be that you're living in a system that cares about two things: you dying for their glory, and you giving them your money.
Yes, people do throw away their lives. People fuck up, don't care, and end broke until they die. But to say that every person at poverty is like that because it's their fault, you prove the system has won.
And if you think rations and communism are the only alternatives to a greed-based, every-man-for-himself system, then I suggest you don't talk until you know what you're saying. Communism is the left-wing extreme, just as fascism and nazism is the left. There's a whole spectrum of ideals between what we have and communism.