BlackStaticWolf
Member
el felixio said:The guy's lawyer was trying to say: He's 14, he doesn't know anything. That was his best defence.
That's not a defense. It's a method of witness impeachment. In other words, he's saying that because you're 14, you know jack and therefore no one should listen to you. It's a fairly weak tactic of impeachment, but there really isn't anything else he's allowed to try against a 14 year old, unless he can get the judge to declare you a hostile witness (hence my recommendation of not being a smart ass)
Wumpi":3fp69tcb said:Either this is bull or that's the worst lawyer ever :x
Not really. Lawyers cross examining kids usually treat them with... uh... kid gloves.
Even when the kid is a star witness, the cross examination rarely goes beyond suggesting that kids are too stupid to be listened to. They need an excuse to be allowed to do more, and unless the kid is a star witness, most attorneys aren't going to waste the effort when they could focus on other areas that could help their case.