9/11 was a counter-attack instigated by the unmitigated slaughter of the saudi-arabian peoples thanks to the Halliburton Company's pursuit of oil. It certainly was a dumb way to go about settling a score because it lead to many more islamic people getting killed, but it wasn't unjustified, either.
Two barely makes any sense and virtually no one is even trying to upset black people, BLM has gotten away with more than terrorist organizations would typically allow due to the black privilege.
You're a white person, as far as I know, and we'll all be dead LONG before 2100 if this climate action isn't done, which it won't be, so that's a completely stupid rationalization.
Secondly, whites are definitely the minority in America, though by a fairly slim margin, but in the whole world, the most population heavy race are yellow fellas, or asians, with oh, just half the earth's entire population between China and India alone.
Speaking as someone who is accusing people of thinking like the 1950's, that was also the last time the Mexicans did a big revolution thing, I mean it's fun to entertain the idea of it happening again, but it won't, there's too much crossover between mexico and the americas now to warrant it safe for anyone, and it's very unlikely that America will have anything on the scale of the civil war again anytime soon.
You also can't blame trump solely for hate crimes, he's one person, and he's not even perpertuating the mindset that hard, a president doesn't kill people, people kill people, maybe if less americans weren't as zealous and stupid things would be less worrisome, but that's beside the point, the idea of a free country is that you think for yourself, I'd have said the same in regards to hillary supporters, she's just one girl, people are responsible for their own idiocy, and only an idiot falls back on the 'blame political scapegoat for all the problems'. Wow, look at what you're doing, funny that!
Also, while I am definitely not a white supremacist, I should inform you that whites have never been the majority, that's not our strength, it never has been. Whites are indeed, the minority species, but yet we own all of the first world, and much of the third. Deep down every race has a side that desires conquest, but the whites, have been doing it for millenniums, see Roman Empire, Spanish Inquisition, The Invasion of Masoamerica, the Invasion of Australia, the taming of middle europe.
We've always been outnumbered, but you're an idiot if you think that matters in the grand scale of things. So while we want to, we certainly don't have to behave ourselves, we invented power, we invented the internet, we invented the atomic bomb, you're right, a race war would be really stupid, be glad we're so keen to be at peace, you silly silly person.
Xilef":2yxvavsy said:
What you linked doesn't contain any mention of a law about LGBT equality, it's a proposal for testing social integration viability by testing candidate's tolerances towards LGBT - and if you read the article it's all directed at radical Islam.
I confess it's not an outright vow, but it's a move in support of marriage equality, not against. And this is only a week into his presidency.
Xilef":2yxvavsy said:
If they're going to do this, then perhaps they should ask American citizens about their views on LGBT rights and throw them out of the country if they disagree with what the state says?
Hey, maybe they will. He's got 4 more years.
Xilef":2yxvavsy said:
I'm all for gay rights and equality, 100%, but this is complete the wrong way to do it and is not an act of support for gay equality, it's an act on social integration for immigrants. Also, a radical muslim would likely know what to say to get past these type of checks based on a stereotype - I doubt it would be effective at all.
Anyone who thinks a background check is a matter of asking a muslim or such their opinion on gay marriage is probably misinformed, they check personal records, they don't ask you 'yo are you a bigot' because no one would answer truthfully, that'd be fucking stupid.
Xilef":2yxvavsy said:
Right now the fear that the LGBT community have over Trump is about the radical voters who are very much against gay rights now see Trump becoming president as affirmation that the majority of their country agrees with them, which makes them believe they have the power to act as they wish.
That's not really something trump has much control over, is it? Like I tell people not to vote for me in contests because I don't deserve more awards but that doesn't stop them.
He's setting a good example, if some people aren't taking that example the way he may or may not intend, what can you really do? People are gonna be terrible bigots regardless of political influence if they are so inclined, and you can't fix stupid people, it's why no one tries.
Xilef":2yxvavsy said:
Additionally Monkey, you can't say there's little chance of it being false or misinformation because the website the article is from is against the subject it is reporting about; articles can be crafted very specifically to get a certain response from readers. If they have a history of posting anti gay articles then the majority of their readers are likely to follow that line of thinking, when they see this article they're going to have a prior thoughts and ideas that will affect what they take away from this article.
Okay, my bad. But it seems less likely to be misinformation when it's aimed against the cause than with it.
Xilef":2yxvavsy said:
If you believe Trump is a good person and are for gay rights, then you'll see this as a good article about good things. If you believe he's good and are against gay rights, then you'll read about that website's comment about the gay community's response and feel that they are simply against Trump no matter what. Perhaps you'll feel Trump is pandering to get votes from the gay community. Perhaps you'll see this as Trump betraying his primary voters.
Shrug, that's why I continually state you don't judge trump on his voterbase. He's one man, people don't act a way because he told them to, people act a way because they found him as an excuse to.
Xilef":2yxvavsy said:
Overall, that article is painting Trump in a good picture and is focusing specifically on the ungrateful response from other communities and bodies. From the point of view of others, Trump can wave all the rainbow flags he wants, it won't excuse the type of person they believe he is.
Yeah but, it does mean that for those not victim to deep-rooted bias, there's a side to him that is okay.
My thoughts on trump shifted back and forth greatly leading up to the election, and I debated and learned a lot of what he really was from people who had looked deeper. Definitely, he's not perfect, my point is that he's gonna get hate from people who wanted hillary to win, much like hillary would've gotten hate from people who wanted trump to win had the election gone differently. You have to judge them based on them themselves, not their followers, because followers are just sheep, it's the shepherd leading them who should concern you.
Also for a final time, Trump isn't out to make enemies with the mexicans or even the islamic people, he's just trying to make America a safer place, and outlaw some illegal immigrants, which-- while heavy-handed in how it's being carried out, isn't distinctively wrong, in fact it's distinctively the right thing to do, it's not purely moral, but then neither is letting them stay, is it?
The main reason I support trump isn't his policies, his support for the lgbqt communities, his american supremacy or any of the ridiculous or good or even just funny entertaining and stupid things he does, it's because he's fresh meat, he's a complete fuck you to the typical monopoly of republicans and democrats, I think that's also why so many voted for him, he's pretty new in politics, he's come far because people wanted to see what would happen if someone fresh to the scene stepped up as president.
He's certainly not hitler, or a bad person, he's not perfect, but he's actually done nothing wrong so far concerning himself or policies, only his zealous supporters, and you can't escape that, no matter who is elected.
Also it'll die down over the next couple of months, people only have so much energy. Even the media won't bother to keep fear-mongering once people stop buying into it, which is already largely happening.
This same thing happened for the Obama election.
