Mega Flare;275863 said:from what I read shes underage in that nude pic
Anglachel;276148 said:Lol like everyone is this thread is like "yeah just seen the pics!!!"
Mega Flare;275863 said:from what I read shes underage in that nude pic
Mega Flare;276431 said:people your looking at underage porn! your all sick -.-
Mega Flare;276686 said:isnt underage porn ILLEGAL?
you guys are acting like you've never seen a naked woman in an internet picture before
seriously she's not even good looking and her pose is so bland
the only upside is that she was like fifteen when she took the picture but still i've seen younger soLOL Minkoff! You serious? In any case haven't seen you in years.
TREG;276723 said:You're comparing smoking a joint to watching child porn?
You're an idiot.
Yeah, erm, analogies need similarities. Getting high doesn't compare to looking at quasi-illegal images.Diedrupo;276837":36hubpi5 said:WTF?
I'm comparing 15-17 year olds looking at this particular photo to smoking a joint (in the sense that they are both illegal BUT WHO GIVES A FUCK). Most people lose their virginity around 15-17, so I don't see why a kid (Note that I never said anything about adults) looking at a photo of a naked girl is worse than having underage sex.
Besides, this is nothing more than a picture of a girl standing there naked. It's not like there are ten guys bukkakin' all over her while she gets dp'ed. Anyone who thinks the picture is so horrible that people need to go to jail over it (even though it was kids that leaked it LOL) is an idiot. And if the picture was truly "child porn" under actual legal definitions, i'd think Vaneta, the lawyer-chick, would have said something more than just "she's cute".