Well since this sub-forum's description mentions sharing thoughts, I thought I'd mention this.
I was playing around with an event system I made, and noticed that I had a show text command, and two choices after it. However, these choices were in another text box. I thought I made a silly novice mistake of some sort, like adding another line or something to that effect, but nothing fixed it. To solve this problem, I first wrote down some thoughts, such as "How do you get the choices in the same box" and "What are the limits?". Of course the answer is you need to have the choices directly after the text, which is what my event had.
Well, for the most part that is. I had a line of commenting in-between the two event commands! Cut it and pasted it to the top instead, and the event ran perfectly! This was quite interesting to me, considering that RMXP says something like this when you right click on "Show Comment" and select "What's This?": "...A text field to comment on your events in that is ignored by the compiler..."
Well apparently this isn't true. :specs: What do you guys think of this? Is it only me? :smoke:
I was playing around with an event system I made, and noticed that I had a show text command, and two choices after it. However, these choices were in another text box. I thought I made a silly novice mistake of some sort, like adding another line or something to that effect, but nothing fixed it. To solve this problem, I first wrote down some thoughts, such as "How do you get the choices in the same box" and "What are the limits?". Of course the answer is you need to have the choices directly after the text, which is what my event had.
Well, for the most part that is. I had a line of commenting in-between the two event commands! Cut it and pasted it to the top instead, and the event ran perfectly! This was quite interesting to me, considering that RMXP says something like this when you right click on "Show Comment" and select "What's This?": "...A text field to comment on your events in that is ignored by the compiler..."
Well apparently this isn't true. :specs: What do you guys think of this? Is it only me? :smoke: