Envision, Create, Share

Welcome to HBGames, a leading amateur game development forum and Discord server. All are welcome, and amongst our ranks you will find experts in their field from all aspects of video game design and development.

Bullied teen awarded income for life.

PK8

Member

Source: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/05/14/1178995042035.html
http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2007/05/ ... x380,0.jpg[/IMG]
Benjamin and his mother, Angela, at court in February.
A bullied teenager will receive substantial damages and an income for life after a Supreme Court judge found NSW educational authorities failed in their duty of care to deal with playground assaults and bullying.
Benjamin Cox's mother, Angela, sued the State of NSW on behalf of the Hunter Valley teenager.
He will receive at least $220,000 for pain and suffering.
She said the bullying, which started in infants school, had resulted in her son having little education and being unable to work.
Outside court his barrister, Dennis Wheelahan, QC, said the judgement had implications for the education system.
"The implications are that pupils in our school systems who are the subject of this type of conduct [if liability is established] can expect to recover substantial damages as is the case for Benjamin Cox."
In her judgement, delivered today, Justice Carolyn Simpson commented that Mr Cox's "adolescence has been all but destroyed; his adulthood will not be any better. He will never know the satisfaction of employment. He will suffer anxiety and depression, almost certainly, for the rest of his life".
During the case, the judge heard that, while at Woodberry Public School in 1995, Mr Cox was "throttled" by an older boy, and received compensation from the Victims Compensation Tribunal over the attack. By the time he went to high school, his mother said he thought school a "scary proposition".
"He didn't like crowds, he didn't like teachers, didn't like the work," she said.
The court heard Mr Cox, who is now 18, was a virtual recluse. He had only completed schooling up until the end of year 7, and an attempt at home schooling had failed.
His mother said he rarely went out, had no friends, and was on a pension.
"He just locks himself in his room playing PlayStation games," she said.
AAP reports: While the exact amount of damages has not yet been calculated, Mr Cox's legal team expects it to be about $1 million, thought to be a record in a school bullying case.
Today's climax of the case coincided with a Federal Government move to give teachers and principals more power to address schoolyard bullying, and provide parents with more information about discipline, bullying and poor behaviour.
Mr Cox's case might also open the way for substantial damages awards for other bullying victims, lawyers said.
Mrs Cox gave evidence of her son becoming "absolutely petrified" of going to school, particularly after his tormentor tried to strangle him in February 1995.
When she complained about the school's inaction, she said a Department of Education officer told her "bullying builds character".
Her son continued to have nightmares and headaches, cried all the time and developed a severe stutter.
The little boy refused to use public toilets after telling his mother the older pupil jumped out from buildings - including the school toilets - and scared him.
Once she was called to the school office to find her son crying, with a lower tooth missing and a bleeding lip.
He told her the older boy had "tried to shove his jumper down his throat".
Justice Simpson accepted Mr Cox was subjected to "harassment, bullying and assault" at the hands of the other boy.
She also accepted that Mrs Cox made repeated attempts to have the school authorities intervene and control the conduct of the other boy.
"The staff made no attempt to deal with a serious problem," the judge added.
"The school authorities responded quite inadequately to an escalating problem and failed to take such steps as were reasonably required to protect [Mr Cox] from the conduct of a plainly behaviourally disturbed older pupil."
When Mrs Cox took her son out of the school in September 1995, she told the principal she was not going to submit him to any more bullying or hurting.
She said the principal told her: "You lose some kids and keep some."
Justice Simpson accepted psychiatric evidence that Mr Cox had been a "very vulnerable" boy, having a genetic predisposition to depression or other such conditions.
But she also accepted that the bullying was the initiating factor that led to his current condition - variously described as separation anxiety disorder; post-traumatic stress disorder and depression.
 
Well, the school DID fail to take action on several counts. That alone is bad enough, but someone being bullied bad enough to actually become INCAPABLE of working is pretty sad. But I don't think he should simply live off of state funds. McDonald's can hire people like him easy. He'd still be getting paid, and he'd be able to live somewhere without his mom just as fine.
 

Kraft

Sponsor

People will sue over anything :p
Really pisses me off that people like him, who can't just suck it up and live with it anyway. If he is getting bullied, why not say something about it? To his mother, the principal... or someone with authority (like a lawer or something) and get this solved before he decides to skip school for 5 years? and then sue because he was too friking dumb to do anything but play Playstation?

I hate the fact that people here in the US will sue over anything and everything.

Must I bring up the Mcdonalds case where the lady sued over her spilling her cup of coffee all over herself? and then sues them for not saying that you shouldn't add the creamer and sugar while driving?
 
Kraft;207616 said:
People will sue over anything :p
Really pisses me off that people like him, who can't just suck it up and live with it anyway. If he is getting bullied, why not say something about it? To his mother, the principal... or someone with authority (like a lawer or something) and get this solved before he decides to skip school for 5 years? and then sue because he was too friking dumb to do anything but play Playstation?

I hate the fact that people here in the US will sue over anything and everything.

Must I bring up the Mcdonalds case where the lady sued over her spilling her cup of coffee all over herself? and then sues them for not saying that you shouldn't add the creamer and sugar while driving?




I get exactly what you mean, but this is Australia we're talking about, but regardless to that he's probably a benefit fraud anyway, well that or retarded. I mean I'm sure most of us have been bullied before, hell I have but it doesn't mean I go and sue society, I deal with it and carry on with my life, this has just pissed me off so badly how some 'tard can go and sue $220,000 out of whoever just because he got picked on for being obese, GET A FUCKING GRIP PEOPLE!!!
 
Look Max, if someone tried to shove a jumper down my throat I'd have knocked his/her teeth out. Sadly enough not everyone has either the ability or courage to do something about it theirselves. Granted his decisions (which ecentually led to this) weren't the smartest, but it tends to be trickier if any authorities aren't doing a bleeding fuck either.

Regardless, they have psychiatrists for these matters, not judges. Not to even mention they're way too late for court. They have jobs for everyone (though that may be slightly biased due being from the Netherlands), this may gain him an income, but little respect. Imagine that if he would overcome all his past and actually work for his own money, that'd make you respect such a person right?
 
I don't see anything wrong with the teenager receiving damages. Sure a school can't stay 100% bullying free, but from what I've gotten from the article, the bullying was way outa the league. There is no way the school authorities could not have heard about this, many times, even ignoring that the teenager's mother flat on told them about the bullying. Therefore I think the authorities are guilty of neglect and that damages are appropriate. I don't know whether the sum was appropriate or not though.

I think however that it would be better to try putting the teenager trough a program with the purpose of making him socially funktional rather than granting him an income of life. That would probably cost some, but in the end it would be cheeper than an income of life and I doubth a life of doing nothing is fun anyway.
 
I believe it's fair as well. If they didn't do anything, he deserves the cash. Perhaps he didn't have the courage to go up to somebody and say anything. Usually (at least where I live) if you go telling on people, especially in the case of bullying, you get jumped. Same thing might have happened to him so, his actions are justified. It's a fair judgment.
 
Kraft;207616 said:
Really pisses me off that people like him, who can't just suck it up and live with it anyway. If he is getting bullied, why not say something about it? To his mother, the principal... or someone with authority (like a lawer or something) and get this solved before he decides to skip school for 5 years? and then sue because he was too friking dumb to do anything but play Playstation?

The article stated that the Mother proved in court that she had tried repeatedly to get school officials to intervene.

I used to know a guy whose situation was similar to this guy's. He was pretty much barred from growing up normally as a result of being outright tortured by other school kids.

Kids are assholes, some worse than others.

But seriously, you think it's just some joke that people can get seriously messed up when they are abused by family members. This kid was being abused by the school authorities, and other kids, plain and simple.

I hope they aren't giving up on this guy, but I'm glad he got something out of it.

I don't hold it against people who fight back in these sorts of situations, but I respect the people who don't.
 
There is a certain amount of character that is built by receiving bullying at a young age and learning to deal with it. They established that this kid had a predisposition to depression and was vulnerable to these kinds of attacks, but did they establish that before or after all the bullying? If a school has 1000-1500 people, they can't be spending the time to get each one psychologically evaluated. I'm sure that had the mother taken her son to a psychologist and had him evaluated, then taken the results to the school, they would be more willing to act based on the fact that the boy isn't like other children and has special needs. In addition, she had the option of pulling her son from the school at any time. Not just at the point where it is almost a lost case.

I think that the action that the mother took prior to suing the state was lacking and that she played a pivotal role in his current state, with equal liability as the school and much more liability than the bully himself.
 
They shouldn't need any evaluation from a psychologist at all. 1000-1500 pupils or not, there's no way the authorities could have failed hearing about a case as severe as this. Further, the bullying must have been far beyond what's normal and anyone should be able to figure out something has to be done.
 
I fail to see how it was far beyond normal. I'm sure that a Principal has better things to do than respond to every case to bullying.

I'm sure I probably would have done the same thing there and said "Teach him to stick up for himself."
 
Forcing him to eat his own jumper is normal bullying? I've been bullied before, and the worst that happened was my Gameboy got smashed.
 
A jumper is a peice of clothing, a shirt to be exact. It's rather large too, considering his size. And I punched the kid that did that to me anyways. So yeah...lol
 
Apart from the jumper incident, there was also a stangling and the bullying lasted for rather a long time. I can't argue against "I've seen much worse" though. Is bullying to that degree really so common in Canada schools it drowns under a sea of everyday occurences?
 
These kinds of occurences aren't exactly common, but this is just propogating the whole 'society of victims' thing. The kid is hurt because of this, but he did kind of let this happen to him, and so did the mother. I see it may just be past the point of fixing, but it's annoying either of them let it get that far. The school is at fault for not doing much, though from reading that I got the feeling the mother was exaggerating how bad the school's response really was.

Meh. If he truly can't function in society any more, then I guess there's not much for it but to give it to him. I've seen people with less reason get income for life. (the lady that rents a house from my parents apparently 'throws up when working too hard' and thus has her life's wages for free from Boeing)
 
You're right, choking someone is socially acceptable to build character. Getting punched and being unable to do anything about is totally awesome.

This is the building block of America. The ability to take a hit and keep on trucking through life.
 

Thank you for viewing

HBGames is a leading amateur video game development forum and Discord server open to all ability levels. Feel free to have a nosey around!

Discord

Join our growing and active Discord server to discuss all aspects of game making in a relaxed environment. Join Us

Content

  • Our Games
  • Games in Development
  • Emoji by Twemoji.
    Top