Envision, Create, Share

Welcome to HBGames, a leading amateur game development forum and Discord server. All are welcome, and amongst our ranks you will find experts in their field from all aspects of video game design and development.

Lessons in English

It has come to my attention that very few people (at least those I have observed recently) are aware of the proper usage of certain elements of the English language. I therefore take it upon myself to educate those who are not privy to this sacred information, in the hopes that someday everyone will use them properly.

To begin, I will tackle the humble apostrophe, outlining improper uses or lack thereof I have observed, and explain why they are incorrect.

1. Using an apostrophe in "its" when denoting possession. For example: "The dog brought me it's ball."

The reason people make this mistake is that when the sentence has a definite subject, you do use an apostrophe. To wit: "I picked my dad's keys up off the table." or "I borrowed Paul's umbrella."

The thing is, "its" is an exception because the apostrophe denotes something else entirely, which I'll get to in a second. So the correct sentence would be "The dog brought me its ball."

2. Using apostrophes for plurals. For example: "I ate two apple's today."

This one's pretty self-explanatory. Plurals do not require an apostrophe. Correct: "I ate two apples today."

3. Not using apostrophes for contractions.

What is a contraction, you ask? In the English language, there are several words we use to make two joined words shorter in speech, such as won't, don't, can't, shouldn't, let's, etc.

The thing all of these have in common is that the apostrophe actually stands in for a letter, which if used in its full form would make two words. Won't is actually a contraction of "will not", don't is a contraction of "do not" etc. The letter being replaced is usually an O, but this isn't always the case, as with let's (which is a contraction of "let us".

So there you have it, the proper uses of the apostrophe.

Next up, your and you're. I see people use these all the time, in exactly the wrong places. Let's take a look at each.

Your denotes possession. You use it when you're talking about something the person you're addressing owns. "I like your hat."

You're is a contraction (see the apostrophe topic) of "you are". You should only use this when you could logically use "you are" in place of it. "I think you're really funny." "You're a complete idiot."

So next time somebody says to you "your an idiot", just point out that you don't own an object called "an idiot". Or maybe you do.

Next up is something that makes some grown men cry. The difference between there, their, and they're. It's another one that seems to confuse a lot of people, so here I am coming to your rescue! Or just pissing you off. One of the two.

There denotes location. "If you need me I'll be over there." "There's my cat!" There is a slightly confusing almost-exception to this whereby you can use it in ways like "There is no way I'm doing that." There in this context doesn't -exactly- denote location in a physical sense, but it's still the proper usage.

Their is a plural possessive. It's like your, but for more than one person. "Their hats are the same colour."

And they're is yet another contraction, this one being "they are". It's used the same way as you're, but for more than one person. "They're starting to get on my nerves."

A much-contested point is that their and they're can also be used as gender-neutral singulars. I personally have no problem with this, but some people don't think it's proper English to do so.
 
That's good advice for people out theres without the grammer skill's.


P.S. No matter how much you try you should always expect a train wreck of words on internet message posts LOL!!!!
 
This is a great lesson. However, I just want to let people know, apostrophe's are dirty little whore's, and it's extra cool to throw them around for fun.  :shades: :shades: :shades:
 
The thing is, "its" is an exception because the apostrophe denotes something else entirely, which I'll get to in a second. So the correct sentence would be "The dog brought me its ball."

The way I have always seen it, its is in the same group as his, or her. There's no apostrophe in hi's, so none in it's (when used in the ownership sense).
 

e

Sponsor

Venitis":13a4535k said:
This is a great lesson. However, I just want to let people know, apostrophe's are dirty little whore's, and it's extra cool to throw them around for fun.  :shades: :shades: :shades:

If she said it, it's true! Cuz, you know, she knows what she's talking about :shades: :shades: :shades:
 
Amen. Thank you, Trihan.
Can we please get this added to the stickied forum rules?

Also, in case some people can't even handle your explanation of it's vs. its, here's an even simpler one, kids.

It's == It is.
Can you use 'it is' in the sentence there? If not, don't say it's. To use trihan's example, compare these two:
The dog brought it is ball.
The dog brought its ball.

See? It's that easy.
 

Jason

Awesome Bro

With its/it's, I see it as Gratheo does...

It's, is like saying It is, because we usually use an apostophe to replace a missing letter of two words to link them together, the same goes for we're (We are), they're (They are), and so on.

Now, if we're saying something belongs to someone/something, then we would use its, or describing properties, lets' have a look here:

"The wolf stared at me, its eyes as dark as the skies around me."

This wouldn't sound right if it said:

"The wolf stared at me, it's eyes as dark as the skies around me."

Because It's implies, it is, which wouldn't sound right at all used in this dialect.

Hope that came out right, haha.
:thumb:
 

khmp

Sponsor

Hyphens you mean Mr Sixty? Also what about homophones? I see the transposition of here and hear, too and to, too much.

Also a quick reference:
GRAMMAR not GRAMMER
A LOT not ALOT
WHICH not WICH
ANTIDISESTABLISHMENTARIANISM not DYNOFLAGELATES
 

mawk

Sponsor

DINOSAUR FLAGELLA

What's sad is that this probably won't change anything. The majority of these dudes don't use bad English because they don't know it, it's just a matter of them not caring enough to make their words pretty for our little eyes.

Why can't we make people care? :(
 
Too bad you haven't included the proper use of commas and/or whatever you call a dash - because I just throw these around insanely.  For reals.
Some people see commas to be primarily meant as a speech aid, denoting when it is okay to make a very brief pause.

But in grammar terms, you use them to seperate elements of a structure which are related, but not strictly dervied from the same core.

As in: "My dog is large, pug nosed, and has yellow fur."
All three elements of this sentance are related, as in, they all consider, or are assumed to consider, the dog. However, they do not derive from the same core, since the fact that the dog is pug nosed and has yellow fur has NOTHING to do with the fact that it is large. This is the 'listing' effect, and is the most common use of the comma.

In very simple terms, you can also consider the comma as means to break up, reintroduce and redirect meaning, for in a sentance, there can be times where you may need to introduce external information. This previous italicalised sentance is a good example of this.

Interesingly, a comma can also totally change the meaning of a sentance. The classic example, if you remove punctuation:
"Woman without her man is nothing"
Can be altered to mean:
"Woman, without her man, is nothing."
Or even:
"Woman, without her, man is nothing."
Because of how the comma has altered the flow of information, many things can change. Interesting, huh?

Yikes, that English degree actually helped with something...
 

candle

Sponsor

Actually that last sentence should be, "Woman; without her, man is nothing," because you are combining two different thoughts into one sentence.
 
It's funny, I'm doing a dual major -- BS (actually I can't remember which school it's in) CompSci and a BA History. Now these grammar issues are carried on into university, and funnily enough I notice it more often within the BA students then the CompSci. However on forums i often type or write things out fast and dont really care to much about grammar or about how the sentence is structured.
_______________________________________________
to and too - Too should only be used to emphasize. Example, The car is too far away.
 

e

Sponsor

I'm doing a double major in CompSci and Creative Writing, and I don't notice grammar issues; because here, in Soviet Canada, grammar issues you!
 
The dog isn't it, it's a he or a she. "his ball". You animalhater.

Read the book "Eates, shoots & leaves" which is the dictionary definition for a panda. it was supposed to mean that the panda eats both shoots and leaves, however, now it seems that the panda enters a snack shack, eates a hot dog, then shoots with his M3-half automatic gun and then leaves the scene...
 

candle

Sponsor

The problem is that you don't know whether the dog is a he or a she, and it is a lot better than saying he/she, s/he, (s)he, he or she, or any combination there of.
 

mawk

Sponsor

That's the problem with English -- there hasn't yet been a decent gender-neutral pronoun that made it into mainstream dialogue. All we have is it, which of course also suggests that the subject is but an object.
 

Thank you for viewing

HBGames is a leading amateur video game development forum and Discord server open to all ability levels. Feel free to have a nosey around!

Discord

Join our growing and active Discord server to discuss all aspects of game making in a relaxed environment. Join Us

Content

  • Our Games
  • Games in Development
  • Emoji by Twemoji.
    Top