Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years, highlighted by the tragic murders in schools nationwide. Many people have become deathly afraid of weapons. Are weapons really the evil behind such incidents? Would eliminating guns, which are the tool to such heinous acts, be the cure? The answer is no. Although weapons are the tool, the actuality is that the victims had no way of defending themselves. Gun control limits the ability of an individual to protect himself, and instead places the burden on a government agency which is not omnipresent.
As many Americans watch the news, they are reminded of citizens who are robbed, murdered, or raped. Sadly, the victims had no way of protecting themselves. Many people have seen or heard the familiar broadcast ?Police arrived minutes after the incident occurred,? but had the police been there to protect before the incident happened, the person would not have been harmed. ?One member of the Second Amendment Sisters argued that without a gun, ?You might as well be wearing a T-shirt that says ?I?m unarmed, please don?t hurt me.? ?(Ludwig 2003) Unfortunately, this would be an unreasonable demand; there are just not enough security personnel to go around. An individual?s safety cannot be delegated to anyone other than himself. Gun control limits a person?s ability to fend off potential assailants.
One should ask himself, ?Should a government, who cannot protect me, be allowed to tell me that I cannot carry a weapon?? This is what our forefathers had expected may happen, and realizing everyone has a right to safety, included the 2nd Amendment in the constitution. ?A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.? (United States Constitution) It seems once again the government who by all means is trying to work for the people, is in fact working against the good of all people by overstepping its boundaries. It is everyone?s right to own a weapon and be self reliant.
Many people opposed to gun control would bring up the issue of maturity, saying that too many people would be arrogant with their weapon and would hurt not only themselves but others as well. The point is valid, but the fact is that it is not the government?s place to make that decision; remember the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Self reliance has become too far removed from today?s society and has made the general populace too lax and unproductive. Paralyzed by fear of terrorist attacks, many Americans have willingly given up their rights so that some one else can run their life for them; solely trusting in some one ?better-equipped? to protect them. ?When you're fighting a perpetual war [on terrorism] against an enemy that operates without borders, citizens will become suspects. Privacy, due process, freedom of association, and freedom of movement will be curtailed. Given politicians' predilections, the same fate will likely befall free speech and the right to bear arms.? (Walker 2001)
The ability to carry a weapon is one of the most important factors in the protection of oneself and others. ?In 1982, a survey of imprisoned criminals found that 34% of them had been ?scared off, shot at, wounded or captured by an armed victim.?? (Kleck and Gertz 1995) I have heard it once said that ?an armed society is a polite society.?(Kleck and Gertz 1995) If the whole populace were not restricted in carrying fire arms, the ?playing field? would be even, and criminals would be forced to think twice before attacking, considering the cost-gain of attempting a criminal act upon an armed victim. ?Washington D.C. enacted a virtual ban on handguns in 1976. Between 1976 and 1991, Washington D.C.'s homicide rate rose 200%, while the U.S. rate rose 12%.? (NRA 1999)
Gun control has been and will probably remain a controversial issue for many years; however the myth that weapons are what make people violent is not based on solid fact. There will always be unsafe people in the world and it is our job as American citizens and our duty as human beings is to be ready to protect ourselves from these dangers instead of relying on some one else to do it for us. It is every American citizen?s right to bear arms and protect those one cares about. As America takes up arms in self protection, crime rate will decrease as more people realize they can no longer bully some one around for some quick cash.
Kleck, Gary; Gertz Marc. Study: ?Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun.? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (Northwestern University School of Law), 1995. <http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/KleckAndGertz1.htm>.
Ludwig, Jens(Editor). Evaluating Gun Policy : Effects on Crime and Violence.
Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution Press, 2003. p 2.
Copyright ? 2003. Brookings Institution Press. All rights reserved.
<http://site.ebrary.com/lib/scelc/Doc?id=10063868&ppg=12>
National Rifle Association (NRA). "TEN MYTHS ABOUT GUN CONTROL." Viewed in January of 1999 on the National Rifle Association web site, <http://www.nra.org/>
United States Constitution. ?Second Amendment of the United States Constitution?. Legal Information Institute. 2006. 30 January. 2006
<http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmentii
Walker, Jesse. ?What happens next?? Reason Online. September 21, 2001. January 31, 2006. <http://reason.com/hod/jw092101.shtml>
Ludwig, Jens(Editor). Evaluating Gun Policy : Effects on Crime and Violence.
Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution Press, 2003. p 2.
Copyright ? 2003. Brookings Institution Press. All rights reserved.
<http://site.ebrary.com/lib/scelc/Doc?id=10063868&ppg=12>
National Rifle Association (NRA). "TEN MYTHS ABOUT GUN CONTROL." Viewed in January of 1999 on the National Rifle Association web site, <http://www.nra.org/>
United States Constitution. ?Second Amendment of the United States Constitution?. Legal Information Institute. 2006. 30 January. 2006
<http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmentii
Walker, Jesse. ?What happens next?? Reason Online. September 21, 2001. January 31, 2006. <http://reason.com/hod/jw092101.shtml>