Corporate Logo
- Thread starter AntRid
- Start date
sixtyandaquarter
Member
I could like it.
Your alignments all over the place. You've got One MAN and PRODUCTIONS too far left, unless you wanted that. At the same time you got ARMY aligned to the bottom. It just looks a bit sloppy.
Also because of the blue and, what could be either just my eyes being blurry this early or a slight bevel in the word PRODUCTIONS, it's turned into your walkaway word. A word like productions should never be your walk away word. I won't remember what you were called in a day, and someone'll say "60, how do you not remember - you posted about alignments?!" and I'll remember the word PRODUCTIONS, not ONE MAN ARMY.
I do like the longer space over ONE and below MAN, though.
Your alignments all over the place. You've got One MAN and PRODUCTIONS too far left, unless you wanted that. At the same time you got ARMY aligned to the bottom. It just looks a bit sloppy.
Also because of the blue and, what could be either just my eyes being blurry this early or a slight bevel in the word PRODUCTIONS, it's turned into your walkaway word. A word like productions should never be your walk away word. I won't remember what you were called in a day, and someone'll say "60, how do you not remember - you posted about alignments?!" and I'll remember the word PRODUCTIONS, not ONE MAN ARMY.
I do like the longer space over ONE and below MAN, though.
http://www.barcade.com/media/images/359 ... _logo1.gif[/img]http://i277.photobucket.com/albums/kk47/AntRid/OMA-1v2.png[/img]
http://www.americasarmy.com/
Try to steer clear of existing logos a little more. I instantly thought of America's Army when I saw it. Sixty made the best point about your composition, it doesn't flow at all. Logos should be attractive but retain what it's representing at the same time. You have done a reasonable job of giving it a military feel, though.
http://www.americasarmy.com/
Try to steer clear of existing logos a little more. I instantly thought of America's Army when I saw it. Sixty made the best point about your composition, it doesn't flow at all. Logos should be attractive but retain what it's representing at the same time. You have done a reasonable job of giving it a military feel, though.
Avoid anything that doesn't have an absolute edge. The only fading you can possibly get away with is a colour gradient but then in a CORPORATE LOGO that isn't good either.
The most noticeable alignment issue to me within 1 second of seeing it was the Black O overlaps the white border beneath it.
Not too sure about using blue at the bottom, better to keep it to 3 tones so either white or preferably the maroon so long as it shows up.
The most noticeable alignment issue to me within 1 second of seeing it was the Black O overlaps the white border beneath it.
Not too sure about using blue at the bottom, better to keep it to 3 tones so either white or preferably the maroon so long as it shows up.
Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated.
Corp ID take two!
http://i277.photobucket.com/albums/kk47 ... OMA-12.png[/img]
I've addressed the alignment issues by closing the box around ONE and MAN and shrinking the box around ARMY and centering it more.
As for “Productionsâ€
Corp ID take two!
http://i277.photobucket.com/albums/kk47 ... OMA-12.png[/img]
I've addressed the alignment issues by closing the box around ONE and MAN and shrinking the box around ARMY and centering it more.
As for “Productionsâ€
sixtyandaquarter
Member
Drop PRODUCTIONS totally.
ONE MAN ARMY PRODS.
ONE MAN ARMY PRODS.
Yeah, the logo doesn't have to incorporate all the words in the name of a business. The "PRODUCTIONS" on the bottom seems to be superfluous. If you want it to be there, that's fine, but then you need to figure out a way for it to look more congruent with the rest of the thing. Right now, it doesn't share anything in common with the logo except the fact that it's sans-serif and white.
It might still be the same typeface (no, on second look, it's definitely a different typeface, or maybe just un-bolded), but it's squished, so it looks different. Also the kerning is different, and that looks odd. Lastly it doesn't tie into the logo at all, like a loose end, which might be circumvented by nudging the text up into the white border, like the "ONE MAN".
It might still be the same typeface (no, on second look, it's definitely a different typeface, or maybe just un-bolded), but it's squished, so it looks different. Also the kerning is different, and that looks odd. Lastly it doesn't tie into the logo at all, like a loose end, which might be circumvented by nudging the text up into the white border, like the "ONE MAN".