Sorry no way- if you want a reply-less thread then this is setting you up for one as, to be frank, this isn't a good poem.
Poetry, to be pretentious for a moment, is an expressive tool. As with all tools it
needs a purpose. It needs to go somewhere, teach something, explain something or simply explain something. With your piece you've managed to do nothing, give me nothing, explain nothing and have, therefore, not done anything.
I'll give an example:
simple poem":2ywwad7o said:
I am alone.
Who am I?
Who are you?
I was alone
Whilst the attempt is made to move from "am alone" -> "was alone" it just isn't sufficient as there isn't the supporting 'cast' or 'objects' for us to draw a conclusion from this.
Moving on from this, you cannot (as the Robot Devil put it) simply state your feelings- this makes me angry. Feelings are not black and white- you always have that nagging feeling of doubt, curiosity of what could have been or satisfaction of
something. Perhaps when your poem is built on the base of such repeated statements of emotion, it is not surprising that the overall result is poor.
Finally, the questions. Dear lord, why do so many 13-16 year olds feel the need to fill their poetry with unanswerable questions with no real reasoning behind it. In another life, this was a poem based around the issues a husband is feeling to a wife he knows has been unfaithful. In this other life, the first two questions, when phrased slightly less melodramatic, would be a powerful point. In this life, however, they read like something out of a shitty Final Fantasy Seven fangame.
Postscript: I trust this structure was just you trying to make it stand out? Otherwise, it doesn't work in pervading a sense of aloneness. I can't tell you whether this is an issue with the structure itself or simply just blinkering caused by the poem.
Post postscript:
I take a lighter drink
I take an antifreeze drink
and you simply warn me
of not mixing drinks